34 research outputs found
The String-Meaning Relations Definable by Lambek Grammars and Context-Free Grammars
International audienceWe show that the class of string-meaning relations definable by the following two types of grammars coincides: (i) Lambek grammars where each lexical item is assigned a (suitably typed) lambda term as a representation of its meaning, and the meaning of a sentence is computed according to the lambda- term corresponding to its derivation; and (ii) cycle-free context-free grammars that do not generate the empty string where each rule is associated with a (suitably typed) lambda term that specifies how the meaning of a phrase is determined by the meanings of its immediate constituents
The Lambek calculus with iteration: two variants
Formulae of the Lambek calculus are constructed using three binary
connectives, multiplication and two divisions. We extend it using a unary
connective, positive Kleene iteration. For this new operation, following its
natural interpretation, we present two lines of calculi. The first one is a
fragment of infinitary action logic and includes an omega-rule for introducing
iteration to the antecedent. We also consider a version with infinite (but
finitely branching) derivations and prove equivalence of these two versions. In
Kleene algebras, this line of calculi corresponds to the *-continuous case. For
the second line, we restrict our infinite derivations to cyclic (regular) ones.
We show that this system is equivalent to a variant of action logic that
corresponds to general residuated Kleene algebras, not necessarily
*-continuous. Finally, we show that, in contrast with the case without division
operations (considered by Kozen), the first system is strictly stronger than
the second one. To prove this, we use a complexity argument. Namely, we show,
using methods of Buszkowski and Palka, that the first system is -hard,
and therefore is not recursively enumerable and cannot be described by a
calculus with finite derivations
The Grail theorem prover: Type theory for syntax and semantics
As the name suggests, type-logical grammars are a grammar formalism based on
logic and type theory. From the prespective of grammar design, type-logical
grammars develop the syntactic and semantic aspects of linguistic phenomena
hand-in-hand, letting the desired semantics of an expression inform the
syntactic type and vice versa. Prototypical examples of the successful
application of type-logical grammars to the syntax-semantics interface include
coordination, quantifier scope and extraction.This chapter describes the Grail
theorem prover, a series of tools for designing and testing grammars in various
modern type-logical grammars which functions as a tool . All tools described in
this chapter are freely available
Untyping Typed Algebras and Colouring Cyclic Linear Logic
We prove "untyping" theorems: in some typed theories (semirings, Kleene
algebras, residuated lattices, involutive residuated lattices), typed equations
can be derived from the underlying untyped equations. As a consequence, the
corresponding untyped decision procedures can be extended for free to the typed
settings. Some of these theorems are obtained via a detour through fragments of
cyclic linear logic, and give rise to a substantial optimisation of standard
proof search algorithms.Comment: 21